|
"... I find it farfetched and misleading for
any educated Liberian to suggest that
ethnicity or tribalism is responsible for
the civil crises in Liberia , or that the
Poro and Sande Universities were developed
for purposes of constraining the
reproductive capacities and general
developments of women, including promotion
of the so-called “female genital
mutilation.” But I think such assertions are
not only an act of gross ignorance but also
an insult to the intelligence of the
Liberian people...."
|
Ethnicity is as old as humankind. People in every part
of our modern world, just as in ancient times, belong to
some kind of ethnic or tribal group that reinforces
their sense of belongingness, nationalism, patriotism,
social values, political progress, and development. The
languages we speak, the customs and traditions we
cherish, the food we crave, and the clothing we adore
all have some linkages to our ethnicities, whether as
Blacks, Europeans, Asians, Icelanders, or simply as
Liberians. Ethnicity reinforces our very beings as
persons and nations in charting our destinies in this
world in regard to national unity and progress. In other
words, ethnicity can never be a hindrance to national
unity and progress, or the source of the continuing
violence and instability in Liberia , unless Liberians,
out of misguided individual egos used ethnicity for
mischief bordering on corruption, mismanagement, and
greed for power. So, I find it disturbing at times when
Liberians of goodwill arrogantly attribute the 14-year
civil war in Liberia to ethnicity or “tribalism” (the
preferred Liberian terminology), while ignoring the
socio-economic and political realities of the civil war.
To these latter groups of Liberians, ethnicity is
associated with primordial parochialism, belligerence,
anti-good governance, and backwardness in Liberia . They
take the simplistic view that the social, economic,
political, cultural, educational, and leadership
problems in Liberia are derisive of some ingrained
ethnicity or tribalism, when comparative studies of the
political culture and standards of living in Liberia
prior to the civil war, and informed insights into the
practices of traditional Liberian institutions such as
the Sande and Poro Universities proved otherwise. I do
believe that the main culprit for the circle of violence
engulfing Liberia and eating at the very fabrics of the
nation like cancer is greed for political power and not
ethnicity. Our collective failure to see the positive
sides of ethnicity has not only deeply undermined our
self-determination as a sovereign nation and people, but
also led to our failure in the search for practical
peaceful solutions to problems that confront us as
Liberians. As a result, several self-proclaimed experts
in Liberian culture have sprung up all over the place.
These “experts” continued to see our ethnicity and
diversity in Liberia in the same way that one sees only
the palm fronds but lacks complete understanding about a
single branch or the essence of a palm tree.
For the most part, though, colonialists branded or
defined our people and their ethnic traditions, customs,
values, and mores as “pagans,” “heathens,” “devils,”
dark, mysterious, wild, “uncivilized” and “backward” in
order to justify colonial conquests and perfect colonial
divide and rule tactics, or as a “civilizing”
enterprise. But it is a great shame and an act of
unabashed cynicism for Liberians to regard their own
cultural customs and traditions with disdain, or to even
suggest that the display of legitimate ethnic pride and
togetherness is the source of disunity and conflict in
Liberia . Moreover, it is self-defeating for Liberians
to join Europeans, Americans, and other westerners in
questioning the ethnic make-up of Liberia .
Ethnicity or tribalism was a great driving force in the
infusion of nationalism and meaningful socio-economic
developments in 17th and 18th century Europe ,
especially in England , France , Italy , and Germany ,
leading to powerful entities such as the United Kingdom
of Great Britain, Demark, and the Frankish Kingdom
comprising modern day France . The crossing of the great
Rhine River to Gaul by Germanic tribes from the east,
including Burgundians, Franks, and Visigoths in the 18th
century infused German nationalism.
Currently, the European states of Belgium , Spain , and
Switzerland have several ethnic groups and two or more
official languages, which pose no racial, ethnic, and
linguistic problems for the socio-economic and political
developments of each of these countries. In fact, only
recently the people of Switzerland, a “nation of
consensus” or “Willensnation”, “formed over the
centuries through an array of different ethnic and
cultural groupings”, voted in a national referendum to
make Romansh, which has four dialects (spoken by 40,000,
1.6%) the country’s fifth official language, in addition
to French (19%), Italian (8%), and German 64%
(www.zurichnetwork.ch). Even the United States that
Liberians admired greatly and tried to emulate in
everything has more than 200 languages and dialects,
which do not undermine the unity and development
aspirations of the United States as a successful
democracy and a military and economic superpower. During
the 2004 American presidential race, it was not
difficult to spot the ethnic variance in the American
English President George Bush and vice presidential
candidate John Edwards spoke. Moreover, Liberian
Christians and religious scholars would recall that the
biblical Children of Israel comprised 12 tribes not one
tribe. And the argument here is that having a common
ethnicity or language is important, but it is not
paramount to unify a nation. The 12 ethnic groups of
Israel attest to the validity of our contention that
ethnicity or tribalism is not a problem to good
governance and effective leadership in Africa . God
never punished but helped the tribal nation of the
Children of Israel, which included Judah, 76,500; Dan,
64,400; Issachar, 64,300; Zebulun, 60,500; Asher,
53,400; Manasseh, 52, 7000; Benjamin, 45,600; Naphtali,
45,400; Reuben, 43,730; Gad 40,500; Epharaim, 32,500;
and Simeon, 22,200 (King James Version of the Holy
Bible).
In fact, the Christian Deity (God) is not only a tribal
god (God of Israel), but He also teaches the family of
man (human beings) to look after their own kind (to be
their “brother’s keeper”) in order to live and prosper
on earth. This divine instruction on “ethnic grouping”
is further conspicuous in Genesis (1-12) of the
Christian Holy Bible: "Let the land produce vegetation:
seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit
with seed in it according to their kinds.” And God said:
"Let us make man… and let them (the word them is plural)
rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air,
over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the
creatures that move along the ground." In other words,
every wild animal has its own niche, and all animals
tend to move together in colonies or as a united force
intended to fend off potential predators. Like animals,
every plant and its kinds grow best in certain
environments. This is why we have desert plants,
tropical plants, and so forth. Equally, fish and its
kinds belong in the brine of the pond where they hatch
and know exactly what to do without any instruction. If
you take a fish from the pond or aquatic environment or
from the ambience of their kinds they will surely
perish. These basic facts about fish or animal show
clearly that human beings and other living things are
divinely empowered to look after their kind.
Unfortunately, in Liberia we have not only refused to
look after our own kind, but we have also neglected to
respect the customs and traditions of our environment.
And because many Liberians are uninformed about their
ethnicity or tribal history and origin, they have tried
over the years to deliberately scandalize the cultural
heritage of Liberia by wrongly labeling our natural and
intrinsic values, cultures and traditions as barriers to
our unity. These groups of Liberians continued to hold
contempt for our ethnic diversity and traditional
languages to such extent that they see no positive
values in speaking a traditional language, or in
celebrating a traditional culture, except to think that
somehow a capricious god cursed Liberia with the wrong
traditions, norms, mores, and worldview. But I believe
that by learning to respect and appreciate our culture,
we would be empowering ourselves to work towards the
attainment of social justice and the efficient and
effective galvanization of socio-economic resources and
good governance in Liberia .
I think it is very important in the new Liberia to
demystify our ethnicity and shine light on some of the
misconceptions about our culture and traditions. Casting
aside our cultural identifies, ethnic backgrounds and
nationalistic or patriotic values in favor of some
unknown foreign values will never bring about total
unification of and progress in Liberia . Our culture and
traditions are more than the unique Liberian handshake
we all dearly cherish by grasping in the right hand
between the thumb and a third finger and snapping it
audibly. Even then the assortment of our uniqueness and
commonality is evident in our traditional resemblance,
cultural cannons, spirituality and custom rituals and
mores. We need to decipher the enigmatic riddle of our
ancestors’ domain beyond its current illusionary fables.
The failure of fellow Liberians and others to see the
positive plane of ethnicity in our nation has not only
undermined the self-determination of all Liberians, but
has also undermined the pride of each Liberian ethnic
group. Liberians, however, need to be aware of cultural
relativism, which holds that all ethical truth is
relative to a specified culture. Cultural relativists
hold that it is never true to simply argue that a
certain kind of behavior is right or wrong. In other
words, what is "good" in Liberia is what is "socially
approved" by Liberians in light of the cultural
traditions of Liberia . Liberians need to find the
niches as a people and unite to rebuild their shattered
nation. Liberians must adopt a moral and a social
philosophy based on the norms of the Liberian society,
not on the norms of other nations. Liberians must not
continue to speculate about a prognosis of our nation’s
problems in terms of ethnicity or tribalism. We need to
take an ethno-historical overview of our nation’s past
to set a path to our future.
Certainly, pre-Liberian history speaks about hostilities
between the Gola and the Belle Kingdoms ; the Gbandi and
Kissi Kingdoms, the Gola and Dei Kingdoms, the Bassa and
Kpelle Kingdoms at one point or another. But these were
not full-scale wars in which one tribe attempted to
annihilate the other, so peace treaties were secured
through the traditional Poro and Sande Universities that
eventually led to alliances, intermarriages, and
unifications between and amongst people of the Mende
Kingdom and Loma Kingdoms; the Gbandi and Gola Kingdoms;
the Loma, Gbandi, and Mende Kingdoms, the Vai and
Mandingo Kingdoms, and the Mandingo, Gola and Kpelle
Kingdoms. In fact, majority of Liberian ethnic groups
were not necessarily strangers to each other. They knew
each others as these empires flourished and declined on
the Black Continent. Many of us live in this North
American Empire called America . Go to Brooklyn , New
York or any city of your choosing and you will see
Blacks, Native Americas, Italians, Greeks, Jewish,
Haitians, Cubans, Brazilians, Papua New Guineas , etc.
If these nationalities relocated from Brooklyn to a new
land, are we saying they are total strangers? We are the
same people of the same Black empires:
Khemit, (6000 BC to 520 BC)
Sudan Kumba 6000 B.C- AD)
Ghana Empire (AD 300-1000)
Mali Empire (1300-1500)
Nyanja—Present-day Ivory Coast (1500 to 1600)
Songhai Empire (700-1600)
Kanem Empire (700-1890)
Only through education and introducing ourselves to
ourselves, receiving or accepting ourselves that will
enable all Liberians to appreciate their social and
cultural institutions. And this is why it is very
important for all Liberians to learn the full history of
Liberia from elementary school level to university, so
as not to mislabel the politically motivated 14-year
civil war in Liberia as “ethnic war,” or attempt to
disparage the educational and unifying roles of the Poro
and Sande Universities in Liberia . Perhaps, Cecelia
Bull captured the true essence of the Poro and Sande
Universities during a recent conversation when she
noted, “The Poro prepares men for bravery in battle,
leadership in the community, so they might attain
wisdom, accept responsibility, and gain power. It
begins with the child's grade of “discovery” followed by
extensive training and service (Bull, 2004). I agree
with Cecelia Bull because I know first hand that all
graduates of these traditional universities field a
gallant, highly competent force in defense of their
kingdom, social identities, shared values, character
excellence, understanding traditional spirituality,
communal farming, and other basic survival skills. These
things came long ago. It's not for me, you or anyone, to
change them.
In her book, Radiance from the Waters: Ideals of
Feminine Beauty in Mende Art (Yale University Press,
1996), Sylvia A. Boone wrote that the Poro and Sande
consist of the basic fabrics in the Mende (the kin of
the Gola) society with rules, laws, beauty, systems,
religious credo and military training. For example, some
of their masks have been described as being used in
war-related ceremonies to enhance a warrior's courage or
to celebrate victories. In general, the Gola Poro
and Sande principles have been taught for hundreds of
years, from generation to generation, handed down from
father to son, from mother to daughter with rules, coded
words (secrecy, deep talks) ancestral spirituality, and
practices. Both the Sande and Poro Universities of the
Gola stressed property as a communal assert and that the
fruits of the earth belonged equally to all and could
not be sold.
As evident from these written testimonies by Bull and
Boone, the powerful Poro and Sande Universities provided
training opportunities for priesthood, herbal healing,
midwifery, self-discovery and leadership of traditional
Liberian men, women, and children. These institutions
also taught our people responsibility and self-dignity
to the point that their testimonies in a court trial
could never be exchanged for money or excluded from
trial on technicalities as common in many western
countries.
So, I find it farfetched and misleading for any educated
Liberian to suggest that ethnicity or tribalism is
responsible for the civil crises in Liberia , or that
the Poro and Sande Universities were developed for
purposes of constraining the reproductive capacities and
general developments of women, including promotion of
the so-called “female genital mutilation.” But I think
such assertions are not only an act of gross ignorance
but also an insult to the intelligence of the Liberian
people. The Poro and Sande Universities have been the
mainstay of Liberian traditional culture, mores, and
values, and it would be very sad for Liberians to join
with foreigners to attempt to destroy these institutions
out of ignorance. But as Rev. J. Emmanuel Z. Bowier,
former Minister of Information, Culture and Tourism
noted during an informal discussion in 2004, “No
social, political and cultural institution of any nation
is perfect. All institutions need time to grow.” In
other words, we should not be moved by Jacques Klein and
other westerners calling our traditional practices of
female circumcision “genital mutilation” when tattoo
parlors are abundant in every western country engaging
in female’s clitoris piercing, inner labia piecing,
outer labia piecing, triangle piecing, hood piecing,
breast torture, play piercing of the breasts, men’s’
penis piecing (see http://www.bmezine.com/pierce/10-female/),
whole body tattooing, tongue splitting, male genital
breading, piecing of nose, tongue, lip, nipple, naval,
genital piercing, and implantation of small objects
under the skin of the shaft of the penis; piercing of
the male genitals (apadravya, frenum, guiche, etc.). In
one of the piecing called fourchette rear labial
piercing the rear rim of the vagina is clipped with
big rings, which make the female jingle when she walks!
I think it is time Liberians expose the hypocrisy of
foreigners who cherish their own cultural values and
traditions but want to repudiate the cultural values of
others.
I find it very interesting that Mr. Klein is overly
concern about “genital mutilation” in Liberian
transitional institutions he knows little or nothing
about, but is less concern about “genital mutilation” in
open tattoo parlors across the United States . Moreover,
about 100,000 Americans died each year from “Medical
Mistakes,” according to author Peter Montague, author of
Medical Mistakes, while the American center for disease
control reports that “During 1999 mainstream
institutions revealed that one of the biggest killers in
the U.S. is medical mistakes” (www.sare.org/sanet-mg).
In additional, Dr. Robert A. Weinstein, director of
infectious diseases for the Cook County Bureau of Health
Services in Chicago , quoting a New York Time
report, disclosed that “5% of people admitted to
hospitals, or about 1.8 million people per year, in the
U.S. pick up an infection while there. [1] Such
infections are called "iatrogenic" -- meaning "induced
by a physician," or, more loosely, "caused by
medical care." “Iatrogenic infections are directly
responsible for 20,000 deaths among hospital patients in
the U.S. each year, and they contribute to 70,000
deaths, according to the federal Center for Disease
Control (CDC). The dollar cost of iatrogenic infections
is $4.5 billion.”
Given these huge annual death rates at American medical
centers, and the pervasive tattoo revolution in the
United States today, Mr. Kline and other Americans,
westerners and the few western-educated Liberians who
want the traditional Liberian practice of female
circumcision to be abolished should first seek to
abolish medical facilities and tattoo parlors in the
United States and other western countries that record
high annual death rates due to so-called “medical
mistakes,” and engage in genital piercing respectively.
I think Liberians should begin to question people who
want to abolish or reform cultural practices in Liberia
about the cultural practices in their own countries.
Liberians should not take these kinds of divide and rule
tactics as justification to look down on their
traditional cultural practices. Generally, the burden of
proof always rests on people who develop new hypotheses
and not those whose paradigms have already proved
valuable to national cohesion and rational living. We
should not permit outsiders to badmouth our cultural
heritage in their cunning desires to promote their own
over ours.
The problems in Liberia today are not the result of
female circumcision or the influence of the traditional
Poro and Sande Universities , but about the fact that an
estimated 80 percent of our people cannot read and
write, while about 90 percent live below the poverty
line. Men, women and children, in Liberia still live
below the poverty line after 157 years of our existence
as a nation and people. Sometimes, what is needed in
crisis-prone Liberia is as simple as finding a solution
to high interest foreign debts, building more
universities, primary and secondary schools, roads,
hospitals, agricultural farms, clean water facilities,
fighting malaria, and requiring foreign companies to not
only export raw materials from Liberia, but also to
genuinely give back to Liberia by building factories in
Liberia that will convert Liberian raw materials to
finished goods.
These distributional issues and power shifts, not
ethnicity or tribalism, are the sources of distrust,
discriminatory politics and violence in Liberia .
Ethnicity or tribalism is not like racism, because
racism, intolerance, and hate are not innate in any race
or people. Racism, intolerance, and hate are the
offspring of fear, since fear fuels ignorance. Ethnicity
or tribalism, on the other hand, is about the unity and
collective welfare of the people, as any ethnic feud may
be a direct result of internal political wrangling or
outside interference. In other words, it is the disease
of degenerative leadership and extra-territorial
suppressants, galvanized by globalization and its forces
in demands for economic liberalization that led to the
14-year civil war in Liberia , and not ethnicity or
tribalism.
In essence, the civil war in Liberia was about securing
political and economic power, and not about reducing the
number of ethnic groups in Liberia . Most of the
problems now threatening the survival of Liberia are
caused by the selfish interests of those who are
attempting to organize and run Liberia for their own
gain. This is why the presidency is the most
sought-after position in our nation. People use the
presidency for their own power. This has nothing to do
with tribalism, but more to do with political and
economic power.
What we need to ask ourselves is which tribe has
collectively benefited the most when a Grebo Americo-Liberian
(Tubman), a Kpelle Americo-Liberian (Tolbert), a Wee
(Doe), and a Gola Americo-Liberian (Taylor) ascended to
the presidency of Liberia ? How many airfields,
universities, hospitals, road networks did Tubman,
Tolbert, Doe, and Taylor build in Maryland , Bong County
, Grand Gedeh, and Bomi County , respectively? I would
leave the answers to you, but I would tell you that the
ethnic groups in the four Liberian counties cited did
not benefit in any meaningful way from the leadership of
the four former presidents, who hailed, respectively,
from their ethnic groups. But I can tell you that those
who found power in their hand sent their children abroad
to study, and those who came back to Liberia with their
terminal degrees used them to get jobs for their own
benefits and not promote peace and national development
in Liberia .
So, I am baffled at the myopic assertions that ethnicity
or tribalism was the fuel that lighted the 14-year civil
war in Liberia . I think we should be very weary and
mindful of people who continued to exploit our ethnic
diversities as reversed psychology in driving wedges
between us. There is a Tuareg proverb which says: "It is
better to see for oneself, than to be informed by a
third person". Once Liberians acquire the knowledge of
who they are, they will discover their rich heritage,
tapestry of culture, ethnic and ancestral contributions
to the political and economic development of the
country.
While we all hope that Liberia would rise from the ashes
of the civil war soon, we should never deceive ourselves
into thinking that we can do away with ethnicity or
tribalism in Liberia . Ethnicity will be a part and
parcel of Liberians’ total identity or needlepoint. So,
whether we liked it or not, we must implore the current
generation of Liberians and the generations of Liberians
unborn to begin to see the positive sides of our culture
and tradition, so as not only to acknowledge but also to
learn and appreciate our cultural heritage. We need to
get beyond the colonial mindset and attitude and
celebrate our ethnic diversities in Liberia . Ethnicity
should be considered as a basis for economic and
political development because positive attitude toward
our ethnicity allays fears and suspicions that we might
hold of one another, enhances respect for other
cultures, and facilitates equitable distribution of our
national resources.
We cannot deny that those who in the past hung onto
the coattails of the national leaders of Liberia
reaped and continued to reap the short-term benefits
of political tribalism, but must never again allow
political tribalism to raise its ugly head, or take
root in the 4 th Republic of Liberia, come November
2005. Now, in the spirit and intoxicating influence
of brotherhood and sisterhood, if I were asked
whether “ethnicity or tribalism is the cause of the
demise of our nation,” my answer would be an
unequivocal “No!” Ethnicity is a key part of our
very beings as individual persons. We will be lost
without our cultural or ethnic identity. Certainly,
many things went wrong in Liberia to cause the civil
war and the continuing political infightings amongst
ourselves, but ethnicity was not the reason. But we
have the chance to correct our mistakes and rebuild
our destroyed country, but we will not enhance our
unity and development if we continued to make our
ethnic diversity the scapegoat, or if we continued
to permit foreigners to steal our resources and then
blame us for letting them to steal from use.
Together is better than separation, and recognizing
and celebrating our ethnicity or cultural diversity
is the start of unity!
Syrulwa Somah, Ph.D., is an Associate Tenured
Professor of Environmental and Occupational Safety and
Health at NC A&T State University in Greensboro , North
Carolina . He is the author of several books, including,
The Historical Resettlement of Liberia and It
Environmental Impact, Christianity, Colonization and
State of African Spirituality, and Nyanyan Gohn-Manan:
History, Migration & Government of the Bassa (a book
about traditional Bassa leadership and cultural norms
published in 2003). Dr. Somah is also the Executive
Director of the Liberian History, Education &
Development, Inc. (LIHEDE), a nonprofit organization
based in Greensboro, North Carolina . He can be reached
at: somah@ncat.edu or lihede@att.net
|